A candidate holding a laptop, with a ready shortlist of three ranked candidates and a 3x faster hiring stat beside her
Real candidates. Real work. Real results.

Hire freshers who've already proven it.

Turn thousands of fresher applications into a shortlist backed by real work. Wooble designs and runs job-relevant work-sample challenges, evaluates submissions against a structured rubric, and gives your hiring team evidence-backed candidates to interview.

Work-sample
based
Rubric-scored
evaluation
Interview-ready
evidence

Trusted by teams like these

Razorpay, EY, CRED, Unilever, and NVIDIA

The volume problem

2,000 applications. 200 seemingly qualified. Who deserves your engineers' time?

2,000Applicants
500Eligible
Work sampleWooble evaluates
75Proven candidates
InterviewsYou choose who
HiresThe outcome

Illustrative — actual conversion varies by role and evaluation criteria.

Where Wooble fits

Don't replace your ATS. Add evidence before the interview.

Existing ATSYour sourcing, unchanged
ApplicantsHowever they already arrive
Work SimulationWooble's evaluation layer
Evidence-backed shortlistRanked, with reasoning
Human interviewYour process, unchanged
HireYour decision
Keep your existing ATS, job boards, and sourcing channels.
Keep your current interview process exactly as it is.
Wooble adds one evaluation step — real work, scored against a rubric.

The work sample

Not another coding test. Work that resembles the job.

Junior Backend / Full-Stack Engineer

Diagnose why an API endpoint is slow, ship a fix, add tests for it, and explain the tradeoffs in your implementation.

Starter repositoryProvided — a working app with the slow endpoint already in place.
DurationProportionate to the role and hiring stage — not an open-ended time sink.
DeliverablesA working fix, tests for it, and a short written explanation.

Evaluation rubric

Correctness

Does the fix actually solve the problem in the brief.

Code quality

Structure, clarity, and attention to detail.

Problem solving

How they diagnosed the issue, not just the patch.

Testing

Whether the fix is verified, not just claimed.

Explanation

Whether they can justify their tradeoffs in their own words.

What you receive

Don't get another score. Get evidence.

#1

Aisha Khan

Junior Backend Engineer

CorrectnessStrongCode qualityStrongProblem solvingStrongTestingAdequateExplanationStrong

Diagnosed the N+1 query correctly, added targeted tests, and explained the tradeoff clearly.

View solutionView approachWatch explanation
#2

Rohan Mehta

Junior Backend Engineer

Correctness: StrongTesting: Adequate
#3

Priya Nair

Junior Backend Engineer

Problem solving: StrongExplanation: Adequate

Illustrative shortlist output — not a live customer result.

For your engineers

Your interviewer starts with evidence, not a blank slate.

See what a candidate built, how they approached it, and where they're strong or not — before the interview even starts. Interviews can begin from a candidate's actual decisions instead of another generic screening round.

“Why did you choose this architecture?”

Example interview prompt — grounded in the candidate's actual submission, not a generic screening question.

How it works

From JD to evidence-backed shortlist.

01

You share the role.

The JD, the level, and your hiring criteria.

02

Wooble designs the work sample.

A job-relevant task and a structured rubric to score it.

03

Candidates complete the challenge.

The same kind of task they'd actually do on the job.

04

Submissions are evaluated.

Scored against the rubric — correctness, quality, approach.

05

You receive the shortlist.

Ranked, evidence-backed, with the reasoning shown.

06

You interview.

Starting from a candidate's actual decisions, not a blank slate.

Timeline depends on role, cohort size, and rubric complexity.

What Wooble evaluates

More than syntax. More than an MCQ score.

Role-specific capability
Problem solving
Quality of execution
Testing / validation
Communication and explanation
Decision making
Use of AI tools, where permitted

We evaluate what's demonstrated in the work — not constructs like “learning agility” unless we have a validated way to measure them.

Built for how people actually work

Don't ask candidates to pretend AI doesn't exist.

AI-restricted

A closed-book work sample — no AI assistance, evaluated the traditional way.

AI-enabled

Candidates can use AI tools. We evaluate the outcome and the observable process — decomposition, tool usage, verification, debugging, and explanation.

We evaluate the work that's submitted and explained — not background telemetry of tool use.

Proof, not promises

Results from real hiring campaigns.

We're running work-sample pilots with hiring teams right now. Campaign case studies go here as soon as results are in and cleared to share — not before.

ParticipantsCompleted submissionsQualified candidatesShortlisted candidatesInterviewsHiresTime-to-shortlistInterviewer hours saved

What we track per campaign — published with real numbers once a case study clears review.

DPIIT · Startup India recognitionUdyam (MSME) registered

Enterprise & security

Procurement questions, answered up front.

Read exactly how we handle candidate submissions and intellectual property — nothing here is inferred.

Questions, answered before you ask

The questions a campus-hiring lead asks first.

Wooble can operate as an evaluation layer on top of it — you don't need to replace anything you already have.

See the cost of screening at scale

What is your current shortlist costing you?

Your current interview hours

600 hrs

Estimated cost: ₹9,00,000

With a shortlist of 75

225 hrs

Estimated cost: ₹3,37,500

You choose the modeled shortlist size above — this is a model built from your own numbers, not a promised Wooble outcome.

Give us one role. We'll show you who can actually do it.

No ATS migration. No annual contract. Just one role, evaluated properly, before you decide anything bigger.

One role.A defined candidate cohort.An agreed rubric.An evidence-backed shortlist.An outcome review.

Not quite what you need?

Wooble for business has three doors in.