The BRSR Reporting Portal

• Maps the full BRSR disclosure structure — Section A, Section B, and Section C across all nine NGRBC principles — into structured, assignable data fields rather than a document to be typed into
• Distributes data collection to the actual owners across departments, plants and subsidiaries, with role-based access, deadlines, reminders and submission status tracking
• Validates entries automatically: mandatory field checks, unit consistency, year-on-year variance flags, internal cross-section reconciliation, and range checks against the previous filing
• Maintains an evidence and audit trail — supporting documents, who entered what, when, and what changed — sufficient to support assurance of the BRSR Core KPIs
• Generates the consolidated report in the prescribed format, and supports Comprehensive, Lite or Core scope depending on which applies to the entity
• Provides a management dashboard: completion status by section and principle, open exceptions, ESG KPI trends across reporting years, and readiness for assurance
• Optionally applies AI to extract values from supporting documents, flag anomalous or improbable entries, draft qualitative narrative disclosures from underlying data, or answer "where did this number come from" queries
• Use only publicly available BRSR formats, published corporate reports or synthetic company data. Do not use confidential corporate information. Where the portal generates narrative text, the output must be reviewable and editable by a human — the filing is a regulatory document, not a creative writing exercise

For the Grand Finale, your build should include:

• A working portal implementing the BRSR structure across Section A, Section B and Section C with the nine principles represented
• A multi-user data collection workflow with role-based assignment, status tracking and reminders, demonstrated across at least three simulated departments or plants
• An automated validation engine, with a demonstration of it catching missing, inconsistent and improbable entries
• Report generation in the prescribed format plus a management dashboard covering completion status, exceptions and multi-year KPI trends
• An evidence and audit-trail module, with a documented account of how the system would support assurance on BRSR Core KPIs

The Grand Finale is judged on:

• Accuracy and completeness of BRSR structure and disclosure coverage — 30%
• Data collection workflow, role-based access and multi-department usability — 20%
• Strength of validation, reconciliation and data quality controls — 20%
• Evidence, audit trail and assurance readiness — 15%
• Dashboard, report generation quality and demo — 15%